Did you know? Research becomes useful in Design and Technology only when it changes a decision. A design specification should not be a wish list copied from the internet; it should express a requirement that follows from the user, function, environment or constraint and can later be tested.

G2 D&T tuition can help a child make that conversion on a fresh, unassessed brief. The immediate next step is to choose one observed difficulty, write the evidence in one sentence, then complete: “The solution must ___ because ___; we will test this by ___.”

Before support begins, confirm the school’s G2 D&T offering and coursework rules. The 2027 K234 design project is individual assessed work under school supervision. Tuition should teach transferable research and specification skills without opening, rewriting or deciding the live project.

Choose the next design-thinking step

• Find where the research chain breaks
• Separate evidence from assumptions
• Build specifications from a parallel brief
• Make each requirement testable
• Protect ownership and align with K234
• Check independent transfer

Find where the research chain breaks

A student may collect many photographs but identify no user difficulty. Another may find a real need but write specifications such as “must look good” or “must be useful”. A third writes measurable requirements that have no relationship to the evidence.

Lay out the chain as four boxes: research evidence, interpreted need, design requirement and test. Ask the learner to explain every arrow. The first blank or unjustified arrow is the teaching priority.

Back to contents

Separate evidence from assumptions

An interview gives reported experience. An observation shows behaviour in a setting. A measurement gives a dimension. A product analysis reveals how an existing response works. These sources answer different questions and can disagree.

Teach the child to label each note: observed, reported, measured or inferred. “The user drops loose pens when changing classrooms” is different from “teenagers like bright colours”. The first may support a retention requirement; the second needs evidence before it controls an aesthetic choice.

Research quantity is not the aim. A few relevant findings that shape decisions are more valuable than pages of material that never return to the design.

Back to contents

Build specifications from a parallel brief

Use an invented practice problem: a student carries loose writing tools between rooms and often loses time finding them. A short observation records six common tools, the available pocket width and the fact that the bag is frequently tilted.

Possible practice specifications could be: hold six named tools; fit within the measured pocket width; retain the contents when tilted to an agreed angle; allow one selected tool to be removed without emptying the holder; and avoid exposed sharp edges.

Each requirement has a reason and a possible check. The tutor does not supply a finished concept. The learner still generates, models, tests and revises possible solutions.

This exercise is separate from assessed coursework and uses invented research. It demonstrates a method, not a submission.

Back to contents

Make each requirement testable without making it arbitrary

Replace vague adjectives with observable criteria. “Portable” may become a maximum size or mass justified by the user context. “Stable” needs a stated condition. “Easy to use” needs a user action and a way to observe success.

Numbers should come from research, constraints or sensible practice conditions, not from a desire to make the specification look scientific. If evidence changes, the student should be able to restate the brief and specifications.

A useful review asks: Is this requirement necessary? Is it supported? Can two requirements conflict? How will a mock-up reveal whether the idea meets it?

Back to contents

Protect ownership and align with 2027 G2 D&T K234

The 2027 SEC G2 Design and Technology syllabus K234 describes gathering and interpreting research, formulating a design brief and design specifications, generating and developing ideas, using mock-ups and realising a prototype. Paper 2 is an individual 20-week design project worth 60%; the written paper is worth 40%.

The syllabus states that teachers act as coursework supervisors and assess the project. School instructions therefore take priority. A tutor may demonstrate a research-to-specification chain on a parallel brief, but should not gather evidence for the assessed project, draft its specifications, choose the solution or reconstruct a missing process.

Workshop processes also require appropriate equipment, risk controls and supervision. Do not reproduce unsafe making activities in an unsuitable tuition setting.

Back to contents

Check independent transfer

Give the learner a new everyday difficulty and three pieces of supplied evidence. Progress is visible when the child rejects irrelevant information, states a focused need, writes a small set of justified requirements and proposes a realistic test for each.

If focused 3-pax support exists for this exact subject, students can challenge the evidence behind one another’s practice specifications. They should then revise and test their own work independently.

Continue with the G2 D&T coursework-boundary guide or return to the series directory. The immutable small-group tutorial reference shows the close observation and independent-transfer discipline used here. Official syllabus checked 11 October 2026.