Two design competitions helped shape Punggol’s waterfront: a landscape masterplan competition launched in May 2008 and a waterfront housing competition launched in December 2008. The Centre for Liveable Cities records Surbana Jurong as the landscape winner, and Group8asia with Aedas as the housing winner selected on 11 November 2009.
The competitions answered different questions. One concerned the public waterway landscape; the other concerned homes along it. This distinction makes the history of Punggol Waterway easier to follow, because designing a promenade and designing a housing development are connected tasks with different requirements.
The housing story leads to Waterway Terraces. G8A’s own project account describes its architectural inspiration as Asian terraced rice fields. For readers searching why the Punggol waterfront has distinctive stepped housing, that design concept is a useful starting point.
Choose your reading route
A landscape competition and a housing competition · Understanding the terraced design · From winning proposal to completed place
CHAPTER 1 OF 3
1. A landscape competition and a housing competition
The chronology appears in the Centre for Liveable Cities study, Punggol: From Farmland to Smart Eco-Town, under its discussion of private-sector design involvement.
A landscape scheme must consider how people move along the water, where they pause and how public spaces connect. Housing design must also consider the arrangement of homes, shared spaces and building form. These are general design considerations, not a reproduction of the competition briefs.
CHAPTER 2 OF 3
2. Understanding the terraced design
The architect’s Waterway Terraces I and II project account connects the stepped form to rice-field terraces and describes a combined development of 1,876 homes. That combined figure should not be confused with a figure referring only to an initial competition parcel.
A terrace is a sequence of levels, rather than a single uninterrupted vertical wall. As an architectural reading, the stepped profile helps explain why the development presents a recognisable silhouette beside the water. Appearance alone, however, cannot establish the view or sunlight conditions inside any particular flat.
Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter
CHAPTER 3 OF 3
3. From winning proposal to completed place
A competition result is a selection milestone. It is not a completion date, a key-collection date or proof that every detail of the original proposal was built unchanged. Keeping those stages separate prevents a neat timeline from becoming misleading.
Use the History of Punggol directory to connect this design episode with the wider town chronology. For a school project, identify the competition, its purpose and its date before discussing the architecture visible today.
